by A recent study conducted by researchers at MIT suggests that germicidal UV lights, which are often used to reduce the transmission of airborne pathogens, may produce potentially harmful compounds in indoor spaces. While the study does not recommend avoiding the use of these UV lights entirely, it emphasizes the importance of using the lights at the appropriate strength for each indoor situation and in conjunction with proper ventilation.
The findings, published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, highlight the importance of indoor air quality in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Typically, little photochemical reactivity occurs indoors, as opposed to outdoors, where sunlight constantly interacts with the air. However, the use of devices that employ chemical methods or UV light to clean indoor air can introduce oxidation reactions, leading to the production of harmful compounds.
When UV light interacts with oxygen in the air, it can form ozone, a known health risk. Additionally, UV light can react with ozone to produce OH radicals, which are powerful oxidizers. These oxidants can react with volatile organic compounds present in indoor environments, creating oxidized volatile organic compounds that can be more harmful to human health than their unoxidized counterparts. The process also results in the formation of secondary organic aerosols, which can be harmful to breathe.
The accumulation of these compounds is a concern in indoor environments, where people spend a significant amount of time and ventilation rates may be low. Realizing that they had the necessary equipment to measure these pollution-forming processes indoors, the researchers conducted a series of experiments. They exposed clean air to UV lights inside a controlled container and added organic compounds to observe their effect on the production of compounds. The formation of secondary products was evident.
Although the use of these new UV wavelengths, known as KrCl excimer lamps, is currently limited to certain commercial and institutional settings, they have been suggested as an alternative to ventilation, particularly in older buildings with poor ventilation. However, the study indicates that these lights should not be considered a replacement for ventilation but rather a complement to it. The researchers suggest that there may be a balance that allows for the health benefits of UV light in deactivating pathogens without an excessive buildup of harmful compounds through proper ventilation.
It is important to note that the study’s results are based on controlled lab experiments, and further research is needed to understand how this translates to real-world indoor environments. The researchers plan to conduct follow-up studies in actual indoor spaces to validate their findings.
The deployment of 222-nanometer radiation devices, such as germicidal UV lights, without a comprehensive understanding of their potential benefits and risks in real-world scenarios has raised concerns. The researchers hope that their work will encourage a thorough evaluation of the health impacts associated with these devices before relying on them solely for disease prevention.
In conclusion, while germicidal UV lights can be effective in reducing airborne pathogens, it is crucial to consider their potential for generating indoor air pollutants. Proper use of these lights, along with adequate ventilation, can help maintain indoor air quality and minimize health risks.
*Note:
1. Source: Coherent Market Insights, Public sources, Desk research
2. We have leveraged AI tools to mine information and compile it
